{"id":772,"date":"2025-12-01T19:21:07","date_gmt":"2025-12-01T19:21:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.rf.gd\/ai-plan-unveiled-why-mandatory-guardrails-vanished\/"},"modified":"2025-12-01T19:21:07","modified_gmt":"2025-12-01T19:21:07","slug":"ai-plan-unveiled-why-mandatory-guardrails-vanished","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/ai-plan-unveiled-why-mandatory-guardrails-vanished\/","title":{"rendered":"AI Plan Unveiled: Why &#8216;Mandatory&#8217; Guardrails Vanished"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"NewsArticle\",\"headline\":\"AI Plan Unveiled: Why 'Mandatory' Guardrails Vanished\",\"description\":\"\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-01T19:21:04.145Z\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-01T19:21:04.145Z\",\"author\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"MEI Reviews\"},\"publisher\":{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"name\":\"MEI Reviews\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/mei-reviews.rf.gd\/logo.jpg\"}}}<\/script><br \/>\n<strong>December 1, 2025<\/strong> \u2013 In a seismic policy reversal that has sent shockwaves through the technology sector and civil society alike, the federal government has unveiled its long-awaited National AI Strategy, conspicuously omitting the previously anticipated mandatory regulations. The final framework pivots sharply away from legally binding rules, instead championing a voluntary, industry-led approach to artificial intelligence governance. This move effectively scraps the concept of mandatory <strong>guardrails<\/strong> for high-risk AI systems, a decision that is being hailed as a victory for innovation by some and condemned as a catastrophic failure of oversight by others. The new plan, detailed in a 120-page document released this morning, redraws the battle lines in the global debate over how to manage the profound opportunities and existential risks of advanced AI.<\/p>\n<h2>Table of Contents<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"\/#bombshell-announcement\">The Bombshell Announcement: A Voluntary Framework Emerges<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#original-vision\">The Original Vision: What Happened to Mandatory Regulations?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#debate-over-guardrails\">The Intense Debate Over AI Guardrails<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#industry-reaction\">Industry Reaction: A Tale of Two Cities<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#new-framework-deep-dive\">A Deep Dive into the New Framework: Codes, Sandboxes, and Self-Reporting<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#global-context\">The Global Context: A Divergence from Europe&#8217;s Path<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/#long-term-implications\">The Long-Term Implications: Innovation Engine or Unchecked Risk?<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2 id=\"bombshell-announcement\">The Bombshell Announcement: A Voluntary Framework Emerges<\/h2>\n<p>Minister for the Digital Economy, Eleanor Vance, presented the strategy at a press conference in the nation&#8217;s capital, framing it as a \u201cuniquely agile and pro-growth\u201d model designed to secure the country\u2019s position as a global AI leader. \u201cWe stand at a pivotal moment in history,\u201d Vance stated. \u201cTo chain our most innovative minds with rigid, prescriptive legislation drafted for yesterday\u2019s technology would be a grave error. Our strategy empowers our brightest companies to lead, to innovate responsibly, and to build the future, guided by a flexible framework of co-regulation and shared principles.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The core of the new plan rests on three pillars:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Industry-Led Codes of Conduct:<\/strong> Sector-specific bodies will be encouraged to develop and adopt their own codes of practice for the ethical development and deployment of AI.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Regulatory Sandboxes:<\/strong> The government will establish and fund \u201cAI Sandboxes\u201d where companies can test high-risk AI applications in a controlled environment with regulatory oversight, but without the immediate threat of penalties.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A National AI Safety Institute:<\/strong> A new, publicly funded institute will be established to research AI safety, test new models, and provide non-binding guidance and best practices to industry and government.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Notably absent is any mechanism for legal enforcement, fines for non-compliance, or mandatory pre-deployment audits for critical AI systems, such as those used in healthcare, finance, or justice. This voluntary posture marks a dramatic departure from the tone of government consultations throughout early and mid-2025, which heavily signaled a move toward a risk-based legislative model similar to those being implemented elsewhere.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"original-vision\">The Original Vision: What Happened to Mandatory Regulations?<\/h2>\n<p>Sources inside the policy-making process, speaking on condition of anonymity, describe a fierce, behind-the-scenes battle that intensified over the last six months. Early drafts of the national strategy, circulated in March 2025, contained clear provisions for a tiered system of regulation. This system would have designated certain \u201chigh-risk\u201d AI applications\u2014such as autonomous weapons, social scoring, and critical infrastructure management\u2014as requiring strict conformity assessments and regulatory approval before they could be brought to market. This approach was widely supported by academic institutions, digital rights organizations, and a significant portion of the public who participated in consultations.<\/p>\n<p>However, this vision ran into a wall of coordinated opposition from a powerful coalition of technology companies and venture capital firms. Operating under banners like the \u201cAlliance for Digital Progress\u201d and the \u201cInnovate Now Coalition,\u201d these groups launched an intense lobbying campaign. Their core argument was that premature and heavy-handed regulation would not only stifle domestic innovation but also cause an exodus of talent and investment to jurisdictions with more permissive environments. They argued that the pace of AI development is so rapid that any specific law would be obsolete before it was even passed, creating a permanent state of regulatory lag that only benefits larger, incumbent players who can afford massive compliance departments.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"debate-over-guardrails\">The Intense Debate Over AI Guardrails<\/h2>\n<p>The central conflict revolved around the very concept of government-mandated AI <strong>guardrails<\/strong>. Proponents argued that just as we have safety standards for cars, pharmaceuticals, and aviation, we must have them for a technology capable of reshaping society. They pointed to the escalating risks of algorithmic bias perpetuating systemic discrimination, the potential for mass job displacement from unchecked automation, and the national security threats posed by unregulated autonomous systems. \u201cTo allow developers to \u2018move fast and break things\u2019 with a technology this powerful is not a strategy; it\u2019s an abdication of responsibility,\u201d said Dr. Marcus Thorne, Director of the Institute for Ethical Technology.<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAIAAAAAAAP\/\/\/ywAAAAAAQABAAACAUwAOw==\" fifu-lazy=\"1\" fifu-data-sizes=\"auto\" fifu-data-srcset=\"https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 75w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 100w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 150w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 240w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 320w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 500w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 640w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 800w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 1024w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 1280w, https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp 1600w\" fifu-data-src=\"https:\/\/wp.fifu.app\/\/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWFnZXMucGV4ZWxzLmNvbS9waG90b3MvNTQ2ODE5L3BleGVscy1waG90by01NDY4MTkuanBlZz9hdXRvPWNvbXByZXNzJmNzPXRpbnlzcmdiJnc9MTI2MCZoPTc1MCZkcHI9Mg\/6afcab893f66\/not-found.webp\" alt=\"guardrails\" title=\"\"><br \/>\nConversely, the tech lobby countered that the market itself was the most effective regulator. They contended that companies developing harmful or biased AI would suffer reputational damage and consumer backlash, creating a natural incentive for responsible behavior. They championed the idea of \u201cagile governance,\u201d where ethical principles and standards could be updated in real-time by industry experts, rather than being fossilized in slow-moving legislation. The government, it appears, found this argument persuasive, choosing to bet on corporate goodwill and market forces over legal mandates.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"industry-reaction\">Industry Reaction: A Tale of Two Cities<\/h2>\n<p>The announcement has cleaved the technology landscape in two. On one side, established AI labs and venture capitalists have expressed profound relief. Julian Croft, CEO of \u2018Nexus AI,\u2019 one of the nation\u2019s leading deep-learning startups, issued a statement praising the strategy. \u201cThe government has shown remarkable foresight. This flexible framework gives us the certainty to invest heavily in foundational research and development, ensuring we remain at the cutting edge globally. We take our ethical responsibilities seriously and are committed to working within the new codes of conduct to build safe and beneficial AI.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>On the other side, the reaction from digital rights advocates, ethicists, and labor unions has been one of alarm and dismay. \u201cThis is a case of spectacular regulatory capture,\u201d declared Dr. Anya Sharma of the Digital Liberties Project. \u201cThe strategy document reads like it was co-authored by the very companies it is supposed to oversee. By abandoning mandatory rules, the government is essentially telling citizens that their rights and safety are secondary to the commercial interests of Big Tech. We are setting a dangerous precedent for a future where critical decisions about our lives are made by unaccountable black-box systems.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"new-framework-deep-dive\">A Deep Dive into the New Framework: Codes, Sandboxes, and Self-Reporting<\/h2>\n<p>Understanding the new policy requires looking closer at its constituent parts.<\/p>\n<h3>The Role of Industry Codes<\/h3>\n<p>The strategy proposes that industry associations for sectors like finance, healthcare, and transport will take the lead in drafting their own AI codes. The government\u2019s role will be to facilitate and endorse these codes, but not to enforce them. Critics question what happens when a company violates its own industry\u2019s code. Without legal penalties, they argue, these codes lack teeth and may become little more than \u201cethics-washing\u201d documents, providing a veneer of responsibility without any real substance.<\/p>\n<h3>Regulatory Sandboxes<\/h3>\n<p>The concept of regulatory sandboxes is being promoted as the plan\u2019s key safety feature. These are closed, controlled environments where developers can test potentially risky AI\u2014like a new algorithmic trading model or a diagnostic medical tool\u2014with data and oversight from regulators. The goal is to identify and mitigate harms before a product goes public. While praised in principle, experts worry about its scalability. A sandbox can only accommodate a few projects at a time, while thousands of new AI tools are being developed. What happens to the systems that are not tested in the sandbox?<\/p>\n<h3>Transparency and Self-Reporting<\/h3>\n<p>A major pillar of the voluntary framework is a push for greater transparency. Companies will be \u201cstrongly encouraged\u201d to publish AI impact assessments and reports on the data used to train their models. However, the specifics of what must be disclosed, and to whom, remain vague. This lack of a standardized, mandatory reporting structure means that comparisons between companies will be difficult, and crucial information could be withheld under the guise of protecting trade secrets. For an in-depth analysis of how corporations approach such policies, you can read more at this <a href=\"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/\" target=\"_blank\">technology policy review site<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"global-context\">The Global Context: A Divergence from Europe&#8217;s Path<\/h2>\n<p>This new national strategy places the country on a starkly different trajectory from the European Union. The EU\u2019s AI Act, which entered its full implementation phase in late 2025, represents the world\u2019s most robust attempt at comprehensive AI legislation. It establishes clear, legally-binding obligations based on a classification of risk, with severe financial penalties for non-compliance. As detailed by major news outlets like <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/technology\/eu-lawmakers-clinch-deal-pioneering-ai-rules-2023-12-08\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reuters<\/a>, the EU model prioritizes fundamental rights and safety over unfettered commercial development. Our nation&#8217;s new strategy appears to be a direct counter-proposal, positioning itself as the \u2018un-EU\u2019\u2014a haven for innovators frustrated by European red tape.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the United States continues with its sector-specific approach, with different agencies creating rules for AI in their respective domains (e.g., the FDA for medical AI, the SEC for financial AI). The new national plan is arguably even more hands-off than the US model, creating a truly unique and untested experiment in AI governance among major developed economies.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"long-term-implications\">The Long-Term Implications: Innovation Engine or Unchecked Risk?<\/h2>\n<p>The consequences of this policy choice will unfold over the coming years, creating two plausible, divergent futures.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Optimistic Scenario: A Golden Age of Innovation<\/strong><br \/>Proponents argue that this light-touch approach will unleash a wave of creativity and investment. Freed from the fear of punitive regulation, startups and established firms alike will push the boundaries of what is possible. The nation could become the world\u2019s preeminent hub for AI research, attracting the best minds and generating trillions in economic value. In this future, the industry successfully self-regulates, developing powerful and safe AI that solves major challenges in medicine, climate change, and science, validating the government\u2019s gamble.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Pessimistic Scenario: A Cascade of Failures<\/strong><br \/>Critics, however, paint a much darker picture. They fear a \u201crace to the bottom,\u201d where companies cut corners on safety and ethics to gain a competitive edge. Without mandatory <strong>guardrails<\/strong>, we could see a proliferation of biased algorithms that deny people loans, jobs, and parole based on flawed data. A major AI-driven failure in a critical sector\u2014like an energy grid collapse or a financial market crash\u2014could occur, causing immense harm. In this scenario, public trust in AI evaporates, and the government is eventually forced to intervene with emergency legislation far more draconian than what was originally proposed, but only after significant damage has been done.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the 2025 National AI Strategy is a high-stakes wager on the character of the tech industry. It bets that the promise of market leadership is a sufficient incentive for responsible behavior. As AI systems become more autonomous and more deeply integrated into the fabric of our society, the world will be watching to see if this bet pays off. The debate over the necessity of hard-coded, mandatory rules is far from over; it has simply entered a new, and potentially more perilous, phase.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>December 1, 2025 \u2013 In a seismic policy reversal that has sent shockwaves through the technology sector and civil society alike, the federal government has unveiled its long-awaited National AI Strategy, conspicuously omitting the previously anticipated mandatory regulations. The final framework pivots sharply away from legally binding rules, instead championing a voluntary, industry-led approach to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-772","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-world-news"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":116,"url":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/hana-financial-to-nearly-double-data-experts-to-3-000-by-2027\/","url_meta":{"origin":772,"position":0},"title":"Hana Financial to Nearly Double Data Experts to 3,000 by 2027","author":"invincibleseven","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Hana Financial Group has announced a bold strategic initiative to significantly expand its data and artificial intelligence capabilities, aiming to nearly double its team of data specialists to 3,000 by 2027. This move is a cornerstone of the company's vision to become a leading \"Data Core Bank.\" Forging a Data-Centric\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;World News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"World News","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/category\/world-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":205,"url":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/reeves-uk-budget-labour-s-plan-for-tax-spending-growth\/","url_meta":{"origin":772,"position":1},"title":"Reeves&#8217; UK Budget: Labour&#8217;s Plan for Tax, Spending &#038; Growth","author":"invincibleseven","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Labour Unveils Ambitious Economic Strategy UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves has presented a new budget aimed at achieving the highest sustained economic growth in the G7. The plan introduces significant fiscal changes while committing to bolstering public services, all underpinned by a strict set of fiscal rules and independent verification\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;World News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"World News","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/category\/world-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230,"url":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/record-store-day-black-friday-2025-bay-area-vinyl-treasures-unveiled\/","url_meta":{"origin":772,"position":2},"title":"Record Store Day Black Friday 2025: Bay Area Vinyl Treasures Unveiled","author":"invincibleseven","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Music enthusiasts and vinyl collectors in the Bay Area are already looking forward to Record Store Day Black Friday 2025. This annual event transforms the day after Thanksgiving into a thrilling hunt for exclusive vinyl releases, special reissues, and unique collectibles, all while celebrating the enduring culture of independent record\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;World News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"World News","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/category\/world-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":859,"url":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/untitled\/","url_meta":{"origin":772,"position":3},"title":"Untitled","author":"invincibleseven","date":"December 2, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"No content","rel":"","context":"In &quot;World News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"World News","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/category\/world-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":191,"url":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/inside-rachel-reeves-uk-budget-key-economic-proposals\/","url_meta":{"origin":772,"position":4},"title":"Inside Rachel Reeves&#8217; UK Budget: Key Economic Proposals","author":"invincibleseven","date":"November 26, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Labour's Blueprint for Britain's Economy UK Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves has unveiled a comprehensive economic strategy, presenting a clear alternative to the current government's fiscal policies. Aimed at fostering stability and promoting long-term growth, the proposed budget outlines a series of targeted measures designed to overhaul the UK's economic landscape.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;World News&quot;","block_context":{"text":"World News","link":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/category\/world-news\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pgYD8Y-cs","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/772","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=772"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/772\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=772"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=772"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mei-reviews.wasmer.app\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=772"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}